Except for Ed Markey, Congressional Privacy Caucus Utterly Silent on Drones

no response

Two congressional caucuses declare their interest in protecting Americans’ freedom from privacy invasions and liberty violations.

Congressional Progressive Caucus:

“We pledge our unwavering commitment…

… To sunset expiring provisions of the Patriot Act and bring remaining provisions into line with the U. S. Constitution.

… To protect the personal privacy of all Americans from unbridled police powers and unchecked government intrusion.”

Bipartisan Privacy Caucus:

“The Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus was designed to educate Members of Congress and their staff on matter of individual privacy, to provide a forum for the discussion of these issues, and to serve as a legislative advocate for personal privacy matters.”

That’s got to be an ironic statement, because a sincere “Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus” would actually, you know, serve as a legislative advocate for personal privacy matters.

But that’s not what’s happening, not if you go by observable support of actual bills that would advocate for personal privacy in our surveillance-mad society. There are four bills before the House of Representatives that would offer Americans privacy protections against the unmanned drone aircraft being flown over our skies, over our heads, photographing our private activities without notice or warrant. They are:

  1. H.R. 972: “Prohibits a person or entity acting under the authority of the United States from using a drone to gather evidence or other information pertaining to criminal conduct or regulatory violations except to the extent authorized in a warrant issued under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.”
  2. H.R. 1083: “Prohibits the Secretary of Transportation (DOT) from authorizing any person to operate an unmanned aircraft system (drone) in the national airspace system as a weapon or to deliver a weapon against a person or property.”
  3. H.R. 1242: “To prohibit the use of drones to kill citizens of the United States within the United States.”
  4. H.R. 1262: “The bill will require privacy protection provisions relating to data collection and minimization, disclosure, warrant requirements for law enforcement, and enforcement measures in the licensing and operation of drones.”

These bills have been around for months, and still there is only one member out of 24 members of the “Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus” who has actually signed his name up in support of any of these bills. Ed Markey of Massachusetts has written and sponsored his own bill, HR 1262.

Not one other member of the “Privacy Caucus” has cosponsored any of these privacy reform bills.

Their reasons remain private.

drone1

Click the links associated with each of the bills, and you’ll find out that (as of today, at least) not one legislator in the Bipartisan Privacy Caucus has cosponsored H.R. 972. Only 1 out of 24 Privacy Caucus members has cosponsored H.R. 1083. Only 1 out of 24 Privacy Caucus members has cosponsored H.R. 1242. And yes, in a depressing bit of repetition, only 1 out of 24 Privacy Caucus members has cosponsored H.R. 1262 — and that’s actually the principal sponsor, Ed Markey.

How does the Congressional Progressive Caucus fare? Not one legislator in the Progressive Caucus has cosponsored H.R. 972, or H.R. 1083, or H.R. 1242. Only 1 out of 24 Progressive Caucus members has cosponsored H.R. 1262 — and yep, that’s the principal sponsor again, Ed Markey.

Some of you may be asking right now, what about the Tea Party Caucus? Why not look at the conduct of the Tea Party Caucus regarding drones? The answer seems the be that the Tea Party Caucus no longer exists.

HR 1262 – GovTrack.us

So Far, Privacy Caucus and Progressive Caucus Neglect Protection

Except for Ed Markey, Congressional Privacy Caucus Utterly Silent

Related posts:

  1. So Far, Privacy Caucus and Progressive Caucus Neglect Protection from Drones
  2. Even Limping Tea Party Caucus Outshines Congressional Progressives on Drones in the USA
  3. First Two Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus Support Anti-Drone Legislation
  4. 2/3 of Privacy Caucus Leadership Votes For the Patriot Act
Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Except for Ed Markey, Congressional Privacy Caucus Utterly Silent on Drones

  1. Reblogged this on lisaleaks and commented:
    “The Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus was designed to educate Members of Congress and their staff on matter of individual privacy, to provide a forum for the discussion of these issues, and to serve as a legislative advocate for personal privacy matters.”

    That’s got to be an ironic statement, because a sincere “Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus” would actually, you know, serve as a legislative advocate for personal privacy matters.

    But that’s not what’s happening, not if you go by observable support of actual bills that would advocate for personal privacy in our surveillance-mad society. There are four bills before the House of Representatives that would offer Americans privacy protections against the unmanned drone aircraft being flown over our skies, over our heads, photographing our private activities without notice or warrant.

    Like

  2. Pingback: BILL TO REGULATE DRONES, PROTECT PRIVACY INTRODUCED | Back Country Voices

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s