DRONE TESTING AREA CREATES HUGE LIABILITY, AND MANY QUESTIONS

November 18, 2013 (San Diego’s East County) – On September 24, the County of San Diego: Board of Supervisors threw their support behind a Southern California Drone Testing zone. This rash decision puts San Diego County at risk for $2.7 billion in liability for the property alone if a Drone goes down and starts a fire in the back country.  The County Board of Supervisors need to rethink this position quickly, before the FAA opens our skies to drones for testing purposes, and put us all at risk.

The FAA will decide if Southern California will be the home to drone testing as early as December 2013.  The proposed testing area will cover virtually all of Southern California and Western Nevada. While the FAA says that the drone manufacturers will be responsible for liability, realistically no business can afford $2.7 billion in property liability insurance, and nor can the County. A catastrophic fire in San Diego County caused by a drone crash would surely bankrupt the County for the foreseeable future.

The latest wildfire risk assessment shows that more than 16,000 structures are at high risk of burning.  In the Core Logic report, the potential for burning is a scale of 0~100, where 100 is extremely high.  In San Diego County 16,000 structures have a rating of 81~100, with value assigned as $2.7 billion.  See page 26 of this report.  http://www.corelogic.com/research/wildfire-risk-report/2013-wildfire-haz…

As reported by the UT, SDG&E has already paid $2 billion in damages from the Witch Creek fire. Can we assume that the County can afford the litigation alone?

Supervisors Dianne Jacob and Ron Roberts, who support the drone testing area because of the potential for jobs, need to ask where the people will work if their homes and businesses are burned out because of a drone crash?  Aside from liability, there are many other questions that need to be answered regarding the rights of the people to be free from the noise and intrusion into their privacy.  What sensors will be tested on these drones and what happens to the data recorded?  Can we expect to see our family backyard picnics on YouTube soon?

Clearly the decision to support the drone testing area was not well thought out.  The County Board of Supervisors must temporarily withdraw the County’s support for the drone testing area until the idea can be thoroughly researched and public input provided.

On December 4th, a small group of people who call themselves the Back Country Voices will address these issues in Julian.  The County Supervisors need to be there. [Unfortunately, the Supervisors have declined the invitation and don’t seem to care about the citizens they supposedly represent]

Dave Patterson is a member of the Back Country Voices, and San Diego Veterans For Peace.  Veterans For Peace has been protesting against the miss-use of Drone Technology for more than a year.  The views in this editorial reflect the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of East County Magazine.

**

fires in Julian

More than 16,000 homes in San Diego County are at a high risk for wildfire damage, with nearly 4,500 of those vulnerable properties located in Julian, Ramona and Alpine, according to a new report.

The 2013 CoreLogic Wildfire Hazard Risk Report examined the residential properties potentially exposed to wildfire risk in 13 Western states.

The high risk homes in San Diego County represent a combined total property value estimated at $2.5 billion.

Wildfire risk in San Diego County.

CoreLogic

Wildfire risk in San Diego County.

San Diego’s high-risk homes aren’t necessarily located within wildfire-prone areas, but they are within reach of wind-blown embers, said Tom Jeffery, senior hazard scientist with CoreLogic.

“We’re all familiar with how ember storms can actually effect fire ignition on structures, and so I think our data does a really good job of identifying the risk — not just on the property — but in and around the property as well,” said Jeffery.

Jeffery said the number of high-risk homes in San Diego County is on the rise, partly due to the resurgence of new home construction along mountainous and brushy areas.

“Almost by necessity, those homes are put on the edge of urban areas,” Jeffery explained. “So your property may not have the risk on it, but you’re close enough on those urban fringes — the wildland-urban interface — that you can also be at a tremendously high risk.”

fires julian1

Of the major cities analyzed in the report, Los Angeles is home to the most single-family residences exposed to wildfire risk, with more than 60,000 properties in the high or very high risk categories.

San Diego was hit with two major wildfires in 2003 and 2007 that destroyed 3,600 homes, killed 25 people, and caused billions of dollars in property damage.

Resources:

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “DRONE TESTING AREA CREATES HUGE LIABILITY, AND MANY QUESTIONS

  1. Pingback: Julian California Residents Voice Their Opposition To Drone Testing | Back Country Voices

  2. Pingback: San Diego Supervisor Bill Horn Interview – Bill, for Real | Back Country Voices

  3. Pingback: Julian Residents Voice Concern about Drone Testing | Back Country Voices

  4. Pingback: Leery drone-zone denizens convene in Julian | Back Country Voices

  5. Pingback: DRONE TESTING OVER SAN DIEGO AND EAST COUNTY SHOT DOWN | lisaleaks

  6. Pingback: DRONE TESTING OVER SAN DIEGO AND EAST COUNTY SHOT DOWN | Back Country Voices

  7. Pingback: DRONE TESTING OVER SAN DIEGO AND EAST COUNTY SHOT DOWN | Lissa's Humane Life

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s